Tackling Global Warming: Exploring strategies beyond CO2 reductions The world is getting hotter and all attempts to do something about it, or at least to curb CO2 emissions, seem sluggish at best. Can we change our world so that it heats up less, despite the greenhouse gases? The world is getting hotter and all attempts to do something about it, or at least to curb CO2 emissions, seem sluggish at best. Can we change our world so that it heats up less, despite the greenhouse gases? Well, yes, theoretically at least. The temperatures we experience on this goodly frame, our earth, result from the incoming radiation from the sun, and the radiation the earth emits back into space. CO2, the most important of the greenhouse gases (GHGs) absorbs some of the incoming radiation and transforms it into heat. The higher the concentration of CO2, the lower the amount of radiation emitted back into space. That leaves two options of redressing the balance (i.e. reducing the CO2 concentration in our atmosphere to a level somewhere between today's and that of around 1850): Sucking the CO2 out of the atmosphere or Introducing some element which either reduces the incoming radiation or increases the amount of radiation emitted back into space. The first one could be some kind of sunlight-deflectors in our earth's orbit; the second one could be the introduction of aerosols which reflect sunlight into our atmosphere. Technical considerations aside, both approaches are truly gigantic tasks. The idea of mirrors in space sounds like science fiction. Indeed, until quite recently it has been just that. The reason for this is simple geometry: given the distance between the sun and the earth any object that is to deflect a significant amount of radiation from the earth would have to be either very big or very close to the sun. However, in practice any object in space, such as satellites, has to be placed at the point where the gravitational pull of the sun and that of the earth cancel each other out, the so-called Lagrange point - moving the object closer to the sun in order to increase the area of shadow it casts is simply not an option. In 1999, parts of this science fiction scenario became reality when the Russian satellite Знамя-2 (Znamya-2) unfolded a solar mirror which measured twenty meters in diameter. This mirror produced a spot on the earth which was about eight meters in diameter. The brightness of this spot was reported to be close to that of a full moon. It should be noted that this serves as just an example of what is possible, even though in this case the objective was not to deflect sunlight away from the earth but rather to divert it towards it. In general, the enormous surface area needed to achieve a modification of about 1% of the incoming radiation can be brought about in two ways, either by putting up one gigantic mirror up into space or by putting up a large number of smaller mirrors up there. The other extreme would be to disperse clouds of small particulate matter in our atmosphere. It is well known that the dust ejected into the atmosphere by volcanic eruptions exerts a cooling effect by reflecting incoming sunlight leading to lower temperatures in the affected areas. Members of the older generation may remember the term 'nuclear winter', which was in widespread use in the 80s and which describes a scenario in which the enormous amounts of fine dust generated by multiple nuclear weapons would lead to drastically decreased temperatures on earth. However, this effect could be used to our advantage by spraying suitable materials (diatomaceous earth, alumina, calcite, salt, inorganic sulfates, etc.) from carrier air-crafts into the stratosphere. This is known as stratospheric aerosol injection. The stratosphere is the zone around our planet stretching from about 12 to 50 km above sea level. Our weather, in particular precipitation like rain, originates from the troposphere, which extends from ground level to about 12 km above. This means, any aerosol that is injected into the stratosphere will remain there without getting washed down by the rain. Of course, such an approach is not without its own set of risks although at present these are highly speculative. There is simply not sufficient knowledge to accurately gauge such possible effects. Stratospheric aerosol injection may lead to ozone depletion. Since aerosol particles absorb heat this might change circulation patterns in the stratosphere with completely unknown consequences for circulation patterns closer to the earth's surface. In addition, reduced sunlight might have an effect on plant ripening and primary production. Again, no hard and fast knowledge regarding such possible effects exists. Finally, reducing the incoming solar radiation or, more precisely, its intensity will also have an effect on the efficiency of photovoltaic power generation. CCS/CCU Right down here on earth, our climate could also be engineered, namely by adjusting our atmosphere. In a way, the current global warming is also the result of an engineered atmosphere, albeit a mis-engineered one. The concept goes by the two acronyms CCS and CCU, standing for Carbon Capture and Storage and Carbon Capture and Utilisation, respectively. CCS/CCU would solve the biggest obstacle towards renewable energy: cost. It would enable us to continue using our existing fossil fuel infrastructure. If it were possible to use fossil fuels without warming up the climate (and without acidifying the oceans) that would be just marvellous, wouldn't it? Not quite, because while it is technically quite feasible to so, it would generate enormous amounts of CO2. All this captured CO2 would have to be stored somewhere and in such a manner that it cannot escape. While CO2 is per se non-toxic, air which contains too much CO2 is still dangerous simply because it doesn't contain sufficient amounts of oxygen any more. The captured CO2 could be pumped into exhausted oil or gas wells. However, that requires shipping it to wherever it could be pumped underground which would make the process unfeasible. And if we 'suck' the CO2 out of the ambient air at the storage point? This is known as Direct Air Capture (DAC) and it is being tried on a larger scale. While still expensive, this technology is not nearly as costly as any space-based solutions described above. This is where the second acronym (CCU) comes into play. Now that I've got all that carbon, what do I do with it? The problem with CO2, as a useful molecule is that it is energetically 'dead', which is to say that it requires a lot of energy to turn it back into something useful, something that is reactive and whose reactivity can be steered towards synthetically desirable outcomes. However, there are 'non-chemical' uses for CO2. In terms of volume, the biggest one would be enhanced oil recovery. Some of the captured CO2 could also be used in controlled environment agriculture, where atmospheres enriched in CO2 are used to increase yields. A third use could be the carbonation of soft-drinks. To sum things up, any self-respecting space scientist will call the space-based ideas outlined at the beginning of this article as something possibly nice for the years 2100 and later. However, something needs to be done here and now. Ideas like stratospheric aerosol injection are much cheaper, however, the associated risks are poorly understood, if at all. Capturing CO2, either at the point of generation (coal-fired power stations, cement kilns etc.) or straight out of the atmosphere is possible but raises questions regarding the security of the CO2-deposits. Also, it does require some investment, however, far less so that mitigating the consequences of global warming. The most promising and most sensible thing to do remains to reduce the generation of CO2 as much as possible. In weighing the options to tackle climate change, we've seen ambitious ideas alongside practical challenges. Whether it's space mirrors or carbon capture, each solution presents its own set of possibilities and hurdles. But one thing is clear: cutting CO2 emissions is non-negotiable. We need to act now by embracing sustainable practices, switching to renewable energy, and rethinking our reliance on fossil fuels. There's no silver bullet here. Instead, it's about combining innovation with practicality. We must work together globally, be resourceful, and stay committed to protecting our planet for the future. It's not just one solution; it's a concerted effort that holds the key to a sustainable tomorrow.

Même les vêtements deviennent de plus en plus intelligents Interview publiée dans La libre Belgique, le 30 decembre 2022: https://www.lalibre.be/planete/sciences-espace/2022/12/30/meme-les-vetements-deviennent-de-plus-en-plus-intelligents-SWQ2SUX3DZDNJFYWD6RGT3PXHE/

Interview by LN 24: COP28 : Un petit pas vers la fin des énergies fossiles ? Par Pascal Vebros L'émission a été publié initialement ici: https://www.ln24.be/2023-12-13/le-petit-theatre-de-vrebos-du-mercredi-13-decembre Les invités sont: Marie Christine Marghem Carine Thibaut Jean-Pascal van Ypersele Jerome Meessen et Dr Audrey-Flore Ngomsik Click on the picture or the button below to watch the video.

Empowering diverse voices: a pledge for inclusive choices The article has been published by the parliamen Magazine here: https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/news/article/empowering-diverse-voices-a-pledge-for-inclusive-choices Six years ago, the Brussels Binder burst on to the scene like a superheroine, ready to address the glaring issue of underrepresentation of women in policy debates. Nowadays, it is the city’s go-to resource for improving gender diversity in the so-called Euro-bubble. But our cape needs more sparkle. Despite our efforts, the situation remains dire. In 2020, of 270 conferences across 26 countries, 26 per cent had “manels” (panels featuring only male speakers), 68.48 per cent of speakers overall were men, and fewer than 4 per cent of men and fewer than 1 per cent of women were from underrepresented minorities, according to data from Open Society and Ashoka. In the media landscape, in Belgium, in 2020, women represent only 26% of subjects and sources featured, according to the 6th Global Media Monitoring project. If we focus on Brussels, the numbers are similar. Research for our Walkingthe Talk report shows an increase in gender equality in think tanks’ panel discussions, with 46 per cent being gender balanced. However, 16 per cent were manels, only 36 per cent of total speakers were women, and ethnic diversity was even more scarce than in European panels. Knowing that 62% or residents are foreign born, according to the Migration Report published by IOM, this is concerning. The problem is that for democracy, equality and peace to thrive, voices that are not typically heard on panels need to be amplified to promote a diverse range of perspectives. This is even more important in policymaking. When diversity is not represented around the table, the challenges of diverse groups are unlikely to be taken into consideration, because “you don’t know what you don’t know”. How can you advocate for a population whose challenges you are unfamiliar with? As we approach 2024, with European and federal elections coming in June, there is an urgency to ensure the needs, interests and viewpoints of the people are fairly represented throughout the democratic process. Therefore, at the Brussels Binder, we have decided to embrace the words usually attributed to Albert Einstein: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, and expecting different results.” Mere advocacy and tacit agreements are insufficient; it's time for accountability. To this end, we will release a manifesto on December 11th 2023 – a public declaration urging people to refuse participation in any political debate or policy discussion unless the panel is composed of diverse and intersectional speakers. Gender, ethnicity, sexuality, ability, background … intersectionality should be the cornerstone of any public debate, to be sure that everyone is represented. The manifesto will include pledges for both individuals and organisations that all stakeholders active in politics and in the European Union policy space can sign up to, demonstrating their commitment to diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility for all EU policy debates. Through this manifesto we will strive to end manels once and for all, and shine a bright light on underrepresented communities in EU policymaking today. We are facing some of our greatest challenges yet in the EU, ranging from security to climate and our cost of living, and the only hope we have of solving them is through balanced solutions that represent all our interests. It is time to step up; it is time to pledge to listen to diverse voices and start making inclusive choices. Representation matters! We need to empower diverse voices for inclusive choices. You can sign the manifesto here:

Vertical Farming: Addressing Urban Food Needs While Navigating Environmental Challenges Cities continue to grow. According to the UN, by 2050, two thirds of the world's predicted population (some 6.7 bn people) will be living in cities.[1] Doesn't it make sense to produce the food these people require in the cities where they live? Our food system generates a third of the world’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.[2] While according to a recent study,[3] the amount of Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) emitted in the course of transporting the food is low compared to other factors in its production it still not negligible. In a nutshell, buying a local steak is just as bad for the environment as buying an Argentinian one. However, there are other factors contributing to the environmental footprint of food production, such as processing, packaging, and retail. One way of addressing these issues is vertical farming. One way of addressing these issues is vertical farming, i.e. the production of food in vertically stacked shelves. This is, of course, impossible in traditional farming, as the uppermost shelf would cast a shadow on the lower shelves. In vertical farming this problem is circumvented by artificial lightening, which brings us to a central aspect of vertical farming, namely controlled-environment agriculture (CEA). CEA is a set of technologies that aim to maximise yields while minimising system inputs. Here, system inputs refer to anything that makes a plant grow and bear fruit: sunlight, water, and nutrients. Here's a quick overview of some of the technologies used: Hydroponics [4] Growing plants in water instead of soil. The nutrients normally provided by the soil are added in the form of aqueous solutions. Physical stability may be provided in the form of inert gravel. Aeroponics [6] Growing plants in air, instead of water. The necessary water and nutrients are supplied in the form of sprayed mists. Technically, aeroponics is a sub-form of hydroponics. Aquaponics [5] Refers to the farming of aquatic animals such as fish or prawns. As everything, there are pros as well as cons. Pros include: Because these systems are highly optimised it is possible to obtain many times the yield that could be obtained in traditional agriculture. That is in terms of both surface area and mass of soil used. In addition, it is possible to obtain more yields per year than in traditional agriculture. The controlled environment aspect also protects the harvests from pests and/or invasive species. Another advantage is that it is possible to farm veggies in built up areas, e.g. in disused factories or warehouses. In addition, vertical farming can be done on any scale from warehouses down to a standard shipping container. A social aspect is the possibility of running smaller scale vertical farming units as neighbourhood projects which may add to social cohesion. Cons include: The disadvantages associated with CEA are two-fold. The first set of problems is economic in nature. Vertical farms are both expensive to set up and expensive to run. The second aspect is environmental. CEA units are somewhat difficult to set up, a task that requires specialist knowledge, and the people skilled in the art know their worth. The reason why CEA units are expensive to run is that while in traditional agriculture sunlight and rain come for free, here their provision requires energy, a) for pumping water, lightening and suchlike, and b) for transporting the necessary seeds and fertilisers to the vertical farm, i.e. from some industrial estate into the cities. The very aspect that makes CEA a potential winner is also one of its greatest problems, namely that excluded and isolated farms do not provide a habitat for insects an other animals. In these times of mass extinction of insects this is as serious problem. The absence of insects also causes another problem: Plants which rely on pollination for the production of seeds (and thus fruit) cannot be grown efficiently in CEA units. Plants like lettuce and peppers are suited for growing in CEA, while apples and blueberries are not. All in all, CEA is still a young technology. As with all technologies this is not a silver bullet (nothing ever is!) but it is worth investigating and using. If you would like to know more about vertical farming, listen to our podcast (Leaders in sustainability - episode 22): Podcast | Leaders in sustainability | Trianon Scientific Communication (science-by-trianon.com) 01) https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2014/08/six-megatrends-will-shape-future-cities/, last accessed 2023.09.13 02) https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-021-00225-9/, last accessed 2023.09.13 03) https://ourworldindata.org/food-choice-vs-eating-local/, last accessed 2023.09.13 04) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroponics/, last accessed 2023.09.13 05) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroponics/, last accessed 2023.09.13 06) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aquaponics/, last accessed 2023.09.13 07) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeroponics/, last accessed 2023.09.13

Regenerative sustainability, the new sustainable? What if we could replace damaged body parts as easily as replacing car parts? What if we could restore eco-systems to their original state or create something new to replace what has been lost? The is the link between regenerative medicine and regenerative sustainability. Intrigued?

Championing Gender Equality Together: Engaging Men as Allies. This speeach has opened the event that revealed the results of the survey "Allyship: engaging men in gender equality" on November 7th, 2023 by the Brussels Binder. Tonight, we embark on a journey that highlights the profound impact of volunteering. The former US-President Bill Clinton once said: "Volunteering is an act of heroism on a grand scale, and it matters profoundly. It does more than help people beat the odds; it changes the odds." These words are the guiding light of the Brussels Binder. As a volunteer myself, and now, as the President of BB for the past 18 months, I've always envisioned that fostering men allyship becomes one of the cornerstones of our strategy. With the unwavering dedication of incredible individuals like Rodica Avornic, Indre Krivaite, Aimée Duprat-Macabies, and their devoted team of volunteers, we've set in motion a plan, a vision for change. From left to right: Indre Krivaite, Rodica Avornic, Aimée Duprat-Macabies Our journey unfolds in three essential parts: Part 1: Find a partner that is already working with like-minded organisations, and who is talking with men to understand why they are not advocating for more gender equality and even more gender diversity more loudly. And we found Robert Baker, CEO of Potentia Talent Consulting Limited, Vice-Chair of European Women on Boards, trustee of UN Women in UK, our moderator tonight. Part 2: We convened workshops to craft compelling arguments, not only to encourage more men to participate in events like tonight but also to empower them with the knowledge that gender diversity is not fundamentally a women's issue, it is also a men’s issue. Our partnership paves the way for enlightenment. Part 3: We listened to the voices of men. And a survey was launched, last summer for 6 weeks. The results of which we will unveil tonight. The survey's analysis and the subsequent report were crafted independently by our remarkable volunteer’s team, under the expert guidance of Robert. While we express our heartfelt gratitude to Google for their support in making this event a reality, it is vital to emphasize that the results we present are the product of dedicated independent volunteer efforts. But before we delve further, let's clarify what it means to be an ally. Remember that men and women can be allies, to men or women. But today, we will focus on men allyship. 5 big steps are necessary to become a true ally. Step 1: To become an ally, we must acknowledge our privileges. Privilege is not something we earn, but a status inherited at birth. Privileges have nothing to do with what you do, but everything to do with who you are. It is not something you worked towards, it is something you get because of whom and where you are born. But what we do with that privilege is crucial. Step 2: To become an ally, you must recognize inequities and take concrete actions to level the playing field. To show up as ally require an active and consistent effort to use your privilege and power to support and advocate for people with less privilege. Sometimes, taking action may sound tricky or uncomfortable but not taking action sends a signal that you are not aware of the injustice around you, or that you think it is OK, or even that you don’t care. If you are not sure what to do, ask yourself: Is there an action I can take that is responsible even if it is not perfect? Step 3: To be an ally, be consistent. Allyship is not about getting one action perfectly right. It is about acting consistently in ways that add up over time. It is about committing in acting in the long terms. Step 4: To be an ally, focus on impact. Allyship is about supporting and advocating for people with less privilege, it does not mean talking for the people with less privilege but taking an initiative to make things fairer. That means that you need to focus on impact, and not on how your actions make you look or feel. Step 5: To be an ally, listen. The most difficult when you are an ally is not to push for solutions that sound right to you, but the most difficult is to listen to people with less privilege and following their lead. It is also acting on how you want to be perceived, such as posting on social media that you are supporting people of colour and not acting when you see racism in your daily live. It isn’t always easy or straightforward. You won’t get it right all the time. But it is so important that you continue to try because allyship really matters. On the other hand, one of the most powerful allyship actions are the one no one sees. Like privately recommending a colleague with a traditionally marginalized identity for a job or a promotion. I see in this room men and women that I know for a fact are allies of other men and women. And I want to tell you that I see you. Thanks to you a ripples-effect has started. Because you step up, other people from your network have stepped up too. By practising allyship, you motivate others to do so, and if we have more allies in the world, I am sure we can shift towards a world with more equity. Today, our focus is on men's allyship towards gender diversity, and we are honoured to have a distinguished panel of speakers, including: Ꭓ Marc Angel, Vice-President and ‘Champion of Equality’ in the European Parliament Ꭓ Gail Rego, Social justice activist, intersectional storyteller, trainer, career coach and ex co-founder of Work Ally Ꭓ Aurélie Mulowa, Founder of Belgian Entreprenoires Ꭓ Thierry Geerts, Country Director Google Belgium and Luxembourg Each of these panellists brings a wealth of experience and expertise to the event, making them invaluable contributors to the discussion on allyship and gender diversity. Together, their diverse backgrounds and insights will help shed light on the multifaceted nature of the challenges and opportunities in this critical endeavour. The results of the survey were presented by Rodica Avornic, Indre Krivaite... ...And the discussion was a success!!! You can download the survey results here:

From Green Chemistry to Sustainable Chemistry to Regenerative Chemistry? Chemistry in general has got a very bad reputation, partly deserved, partly not. When people are asked what they associate with the terms chemistry and physics two very different images manifest themselves. Whereas physics is associated with high-tech computers, shiny spaceships, and Albert Einstein's friendly face [1], chemistry is generally associated with disasters (Seveso [2], Bhopal [3], etc.) and environmental contamination and the suffering of humans and animals alike resulting from these. That physics is also responsible for nuclear disasters (Chernobyl [4], Fukushima [5], etc.) not to mention nuclear weapons is another matter. Life, as we know it, is chemistry. A rather complex kind of chemistry perhaps but chemistry nonetheless. Put the other way 'round: Our way of 'doing' chemistry is rather crude compared to what nature has evolved over many hundreds of millions of years. This brings about numerous hazards and the disasters mentioned above testify to that. However, just as life is chemistry, so our 'human' chemistry is (and will remain!) part of everyday life, from pharmaceuticals over clothes to plastic bags to... It is therefore imperative that we make our use of chemistry as safe and benign as possible and this has been realised in the chemical world (both industrial and academic) for quite a while now. The idea that chemistry has to become more benign and safe formed in the 80s. In particular, the visible effects of chemical pollution and the experience of resource depletion made chemists think about safer and more efficient ways of doing things. In 1998, two American scientists, Paul Anastas and John Warner, summarised these ideas under the heading of "The twelve principles of Green Chemistry".[6] In somewhat abridged form these are: I - Prevention of waste is better than cleaning up waste. II - Waste reduction. Synthetic methods should aim at every atom in a molecule of starting material ending up in the desired product. (Atom economy) III - Synthetic methods should avoid using or generating toxic substances. IV - Safer chemicals. A substance having the same effect while being less toxic than another is preferable. V - Safer solvents and auxiliaries. Auxiliary substances should be avoided wherever possible, and as non-hazardous as possible when they must be used. VI - Efficiency. Energy requirements should be minimized, and processes should be conducted at ambient temperature and pressure whenever possible. VII - Use of renewable feedstocks VIII - Reduce derivatives. Unnecessary generation of derivatives - such as the use of protecting groups - should be minimized or avoided if possible. IX - Use catalytic reagents instead stoichiometric ones. X - Design for degradation. Chemicals should be designed in such a way that they degrade at their end of life. XI - Real-time analysis for pollution prevention XII - Inherently safer chemistry for accident prevention A more detailed version illustrated with examples may be found on the pages of the American Chemical Society (ACS). [7] Some of these points may not mean a lot or may sound repetitive to the layman but they are important. Green Chemistry has quickly become a well-established field. The Royal Society of Chemistry, [8] the British equivalent to the ACS, has duly launched an entire journal devoted to the field, aptly named Green Chemistry.[9] So, that was some 25 years ago. And today? If you take a closer look at the 12 principles you will find many important aspects, however, one of the most important aspects of what we now call sustainable development seems to be missing, namely circularity. Nowadays, principle number ten seems almost problematic because it stipulates that chemicals should degrade, thus releasing the material that has gone into these chemicals back into nature, albeit in a non-toxic and even benign form. That is linear, not circular. Indeed, the term Sustainable Chemistry makes the rounds as a distinct concept which is different from and more encompassing than Green Chemistry. Green Chemistry is primarily concerned with reducing the inherent dangers. Sustainable Chemistry, on the hand, is concerned with reducing the overall effect of the chemistry we perform on the environment, including the use of the finite resources we take from our planet. Nowadays, the chemical world embraces not only changes in chemistry itself, but also changes in the way the chemical industry works. An example would be chemical leasing, a business model in which chemicals are not sold but leased, just as in leasing a car. For example, a company might lease solvents to degrease sheets of metal. Another novel business model is to change the basis on which chemicals are sold. Conventionally, chemicals are sold by weight or by volume. However, they might also be sold according to their use. Consider a paint manufacturer producing paints for, say, the hulls of ships. Selling the paint for the ship according to the area that has to be painted, would put the onus on the paint manufacturer to develop paints which can cover a bigger area per unit weight of paint. So, where is Chemistry heading? The word is that chemists have to become molecular managers. Just as managers in a company have to deploy resources according to the project at hand and differently once the next project comes around, chemists will need to use molecules this way in one context and that way in another, just as a manager doesn't hire a completely different set of people for every different project. The methodologies for this approach will have to be developed. 01) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Einstein_tongue.jpg, last accessed 2023.08.29 02) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seveso_disaster, last accessed 2023.08.29 03) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster, last accessed 2023.08.29 04) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_disaster, last accessed 2023.08.29 05) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster, last accessed 2023.08.29 06) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Green_Chemistry, last accessed 2023.08.29 07) https://www.acs.org/greenchemistry/principles/12-principles-of-green-chemistry.html, last accessed 2023.08.29 08) https://www.rsc.org/, last accessed 2023.08.29 09) https://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/gc/, last accessed 2023.08.29

Sustainability consulting services Your guidance has been a beacon, illuminating the path ahead. Your encouragement to step out of my comfort zone has enabled me to envision and articulate the potential of my business in ways I had not imagined before. I am immensely grateful for your mentorship and look forward to continuing our collaboration in the future. Sanghmitra B., CEO

Public speaking services (environmental & social sustainability) Over the past year I had the opportunity to attend several events organised by Dr. Audrey-Flore Ngomsik, none of which disappointed. She has a knack of bringing together people from different walks of life, and a way of speaking to and about our different realities. Her views on sustainability are inclusive and wholesome - taking a multi dimensional approach to the topic, but never unnecessarily judgmental. Without being shamed or judged - your takeaways will always be self reflection, perspective and manageable tips on how you could bring about a change. I strongly recommend her events, they are interactive, insightful and very inspiring! Radhika S, Founder

Scientific innovation consulting services I can highlight the consultants' solid people management skills. They combine strong leadership with a solid team player attitude and ability to empower people. They are very good at training and motivating others at the same time that they adapt their management attitude to different people personalities and needs, creating a motivational and pleasant working environment. Reyes M, Program manager

Environmental and social sustainability public speaking services What can I say about Dr. Audrey-Flore Ngomsik? She's truly one of a kind. Every event on Sustainability, DEI or Entrepreneurship you'll go, there's a very high chance that you'll see Audrey on the stage sharing her experience and expertise. She has an incredible energy, drive and confidence which inspires me to do more and be more. Her impressive curriculum and expertise speak for itself. We need more disruptors and innovators like her who are not afraid to challenge the status quo to help minorities to reach equity and create a more sustainable world. Christine R, Diversity Equity and Inclusion Specialist